First of all, horoscope is only a way that shows people’s prediction through the findings of natural facts or situations. In other words, there is no scientific studies have shown support for the accuracy of horoscope or astrology. It is true that astrology owned a long history and it could trace its roots to the 17th century (Koch-Westenholz, 1995). At that time, astrologers would collect a great amount of data or facts to deduce the relationship between human affairs and terrestrial events. In order to testify the accuracy of astrology and horoscope, scientists conduct a lot of experiments or tests to find out the truth of astrology. For example, by conducting double-blind tests of astrology, all tests showed that there is “no effect beyond pure chance” (Carlson, 1985) in theories of horoscope. For example, scientists conducted a test which required people to finish a questionnaire on his own personality. The questionnaire included all description on individuals’ characters or personality. Then we send the questionnaire to astrologers without telling them the horoscope of participants. If astrologers could tell the horoscope of each individual from the description of their personality, it could be concluded that horoscope show its effects and accuracy. However, the results of the test did not prove the accuracy of horoscope. Thus, horoscope is only a way that shows people’s prediction through the findings of natural facts or situations and the interpretations of horoscope are inaccurate deduction without any scientific supports.
首先，占星術只是通過發現自然事實或情況來顯示人們預測的一種方式。
換句話說，沒有科學研究支持占星術或占星術的準確性。
占星術確實擁有悠久的歷史，它可以追溯到17世紀(科赫-韋斯頓霍爾茲，1995)。
在那個時候，占星家會收集大量的數據或事實來推斷人類事務和地球事件之間的關系。
為了證明占星術和占星術的準確性，科學家們進行了大量的實驗或測試，以找出占星術的真相。
例如，通過對占星術進行雙盲檢驗，所有的檢驗都表明，在占星術理論中，“除了純粹的偶然之外，沒有任何影響”(Carlson, 1985)。
例如，科學家進行了一項測試，要求人們完成一份關于自己性格的問卷。
問卷包含了對個人性格或性格的所有描述。
然后我們把調查問卷發給占星家，而不告訴他們參與者的星座。
如果占星家可以從每個人的性格描述中分辨出他們的星座，那么就可以得出結論，占星術顯示出它的效果和準確性。
然而，測試結果并不能證明占星術的準確性。
因此，占星術只是人們通過自然事實或情況的發現來顯示預測的一種方式，對占星術的解釋是不準確的演繹，沒有任何科學依據。